[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
am guessing this is a modern design: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
the style looks right but this mark does not turn up in the data base I am using. Beneath the swords it looks like a "V" with a horizontal slash....
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
These two came up for auction a few days ago. The one on the left is called "lady with a gun" or something and she's from a famous play. The other...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I won these a couple months ago and am just now trying to figure out what is in the lot. Here is the first one it is inscribed 107[ATTACH]...
The "China" mark can be found on modern pieces so that's not definitive as to the date. But this one seems to have a variant of the Guangxu mark...
the structure of the handle looks like early 19th cent. english but I dunno of the chinese made them like that as well.. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
I mean the way there is no outline and its sort of cut out of the tourquoise enamel or whatever. Or is that a standard sort of technique? These...
Separate names with a comma.
