This don't look correct to me at all. I don't think this is chinese made
From the photos looks real could be guangxu period possible is neat with flowers near the ears,
Possible chance 1910-1920-. Seen these in finer paintings with guangxu mark to tongzhi handwritten
Probably late roc 30s definitely roc
I say 1900 early 20th.
I showed someone that's good in this period he said is new with no explanation. I didn't want to ver you off saying is real but I can tell you...
I looked again the ears on the vase look decent dirt of age, the vase isn't to shiny shiny never good has a dull shine to it. The inside seems to...
Is not my type of research chinese Longquan yuan ming. The foot for me look good in my eye wood kiln burn. The crackle does look great. You might...
Yeah agree with verte kangxi some ones turn it to cake stand missing the brass/fittings
It could be chinese also japan does this to same look.
Modern chinese ware
Qianlong export that mark had to be added later they don't mark export plates. Nice one thou
Japanese plate style of chinese looks like the faces japan use
To me looks like 1999. This type of colors I seen in Japanese using chinese style or china Macao stlye
Nice site man love the work that celadon dish looks lovely. My post is old I tend to stay away from straits due to prices being over retail even...
Damn auto correct srry not qianjiang is a qianlong mark. I clearly don't re read what I type sorry about that
I say 2000s 4 character mark of qianjiang. Idk if transfer or print. Usely you'll see tiny dots. Anyway not antique the blue is way off. It's nice...
I own 2 cups very think porcelain.
Similar to this...
Separate names with a comma.
