It looks more like 2016 to me, although why someone would cast off a piece they clearly valued 7 or 8 years after it was made... Death?
And this suggests to me that it is supposed to be from an authorized run of reproductions.
@Ghopper1924
Appears to be Brewick. [ATTACH]
Ooh, luscious. A worthy budget bender. I have seen this composition, using the same stone colors, before. I imagine you have too. It must have...
Think I was aware of this when it came out, but only saw the review by the Met's James David Draper, who was not a fan of the Saulinis, so gave it...
Wowza! Now, if a day comes when you want to sell it, it will have Civil War interest as well as Saulini & cameo portrait interest. Also, you can...
The label on the back, indicating it is in the MOMA SF, says to me it is a reproduction of some sort.
You can tell your kids it's a vintage Croc ornament from back when shoes were made of leather.
I'm also for shoe clip.
L'enfant is carrying items that connect him with Dionysus/Bacchus.
Just for the record, we have Claire's in the US too. I only pass by, but from what I can see in the window, it's a little girl's heaven.
Looks like you need to know the back stamp to determine if it really is the rarest.
Think maybe the points that are awarded so freely to new members who become active but that topped out at 113 for most of us. Welcome, hunt2....
It's a King George VI coin, so that tells you the oldest it could be.
Merci, madame. :)
I have nothing at all against glass cameos. Some are quite beautiful. These may actually be what James Tassie called 'enamel', a very hard white...
For starters. :D
Tease. You don't let on you bought the lot until you say you had to clean him up. There's definitely a look to Saulini pieces. I bought the one...
I need one of these.
Separate names with a comma.
