Degas Stone Lithograph

Discussion in 'Art' started by kardinalisimo, Feb 16, 2018.

  1. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    C0709355-FF04-4904-B68B-A727C9434B9D.jpeg F639B883-F4F4-4CE8-AC6B-45A6C2AF7A5D.jpeg AB295F38-3F8D-4151-B0D6-5CAC1F33BB0B.jpeg 12807EE8-E05E-4FAF-A927-8118219EA14B.jpeg I hope I’m not wrong but this looks like a stone litho rather than modern reproduction. There seems to be a lot of variations of that image and I’m trying to find the original.

    PS Found that Degas made monotypes sometimes with pastels touchups over. Could it be such a print?
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2018
  2. aaroncab

    aaroncab in veritate victoria

    Last edited: Feb 16, 2018
  3. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    Why by other artists? There are over 10 similar artworks by Degas with ballerinas and bouquets.
     
  4. aaroncab

    aaroncab in veritate victoria

    It doesn't look like Degas's work to me... the face looks too cartoonish like something drawn maybe during the 1950's. It's clearly that same scene that degas painted so...if it's by someone else, it's a copy. Just my opinion.
     
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
  5. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    Hm, it does look cartoonish. I need to take it out of the frame.
     
    Christmasjoy and judy like this.
  6. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    It does appear to be a 1950s interpretation of a Degas painting. De-frame it and see what you find.

    Debora
     
    Christmasjoy and aaroncab like this.
  7. Aquitaine

    Aquitaine Is What It IS! But NEVER BORED!

    It's nowhere as detailed as the two links provided by @aaroncab......but it IS interesting!!
     
    Christmasjoy likes this.
  8. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    So, what do you call it, a forgery, reproduction, “after Degas”, Degas follower ....?
     
    Christmasjoy likes this.
  9. Bronwen

    Bronwen Well-Known Member

     
    Christmasjoy likes this.
  10. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Depends on your purpose but I'd call it a decorative interpretation.

    Debora
     
    Christmasjoy and Bronwen like this.
  11. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    CF25F8E4-C0C8-4B6B-AB2D-6B9F58E70E75.jpeg 9589EDEC-D32C-419D-A9FB-49B06BA006CC.jpeg DE009C53-7FD4-41AF-96EA-9499F73BBE8D.jpeg C613A9D0-55BD-4CBB-B45B-DF0EF7F05F60.jpeg BD0ADFB1-CC22-45FC-9C39-2A6389956CDB.jpeg Any safe way to remove the glued mats? I can’t tell the technique but I think it’s a type of print so I want to check the edges for possible info.
     
  12. Jeff Drum

    Jeff Drum Well-Known Member

    Based on this Degas work. I think they reproduced a lot of Degas in this large format using a process in the 60's or so that didn't leave standard dots. Not a monotype though - if it was there would be only one.
    I had one of a different image also a dancer and concluded it had no value so recycled it.

    I had[​IMG]
     
  13. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    Yours was done after an existing painting, exact copy of 1877 “Fin d'arabesqueen”.
    I cannot find the original of mine.
    As Aaroncab pointed out, the face of the dancer is not in the style of Degas.
    So, I’m not sure if I can call mine a reproduction. It was suggested the term “interpretation” but in this case it would not be right to put Degas name on it.
     
    Figtree3 and yourturntoloveit like this.
  14. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Typo. Sure you meant "Fin d'arabesque."

    Debora
     
  15. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Original is in the d'Orsay. And look where the signature is.

    Debora

    FORUM Degas.gif
     
  16. kardinalisimo

    kardinalisimo Well-Known Member

    Yes, typo. What’s wrong with the signature?
     
  17. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    It's migrated from left to right.

    Debora
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page