Featured Long unsigned vintage filgree sterling necklace with blue stone beads

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by Lucille.b, Sep 6, 2020.

  1. Lucille.b

    Lucille.b Well-Known Member

    Got this ten years ago or more, I tend to stash away small items that need more research before listing and more often than not they can sit in a dresser untouched indefinitely. Finally chipping away at that stash due to less inventory due to Covid.

    So, what can you tell me? This piece is LONG, 50 inches. Both pendant and necklace test positive for silver. I have a number of questions!

    Age? Thinking maybe 1960s-70s? Could it be earlier?

    Also curious about the blue stones on the necklace, not solid blue, some striations, even a red line in one. What kind of stone would be typical for this kind of thing?

    Drawing a blank on keywords that allow me to search similar. Thanks for taking a look.

    blue1.jpg

    blue4.jpg

    blue889.jpg
    Rings at clasp are soldered.

    blue9.jpg

    blueex.jpg

    blueex4.jpg
    The bale on this is solid w/no opening, so not sure how you (or where) you are supposed to attach this to the necklace.

    bluepend.jpg

    blue6.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    singing, cxgirl, lovewrens and 9 others like this.
  2. stracci

    stracci Well-Known Member

  3. KSW

    KSW Well-Known Member

    No idea, but this is lovely!.
     
    ulilwitch and Lucille.b like this.
  4. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    The metalwork is called filigree and is usually made either of silver or gold.
    I believe it's older than the 60/70s.
    Filigree has a really long tradition.
    Are there any marks on it?
     
  5. clutteredcloset49

    clutteredcloset49 Well-Known Member

    Oh, I do the same thing. Only in my case it's more than just jewelry. It's glass, pottery, all sorts of things. So they don't fit in drawers. Boxes and totes everywhere.

    Your necklace is lovely.
    May indeed be lapis as Stracci said.

    Looks more 1920s/30s to me, but wait for others to comment.
     
  6. Lucille.b

    Lucille.b Well-Known Member

    Thanks all.

    No marks anywhere.

    Also the pendant looks like such a match, but no idea how or where you would attach it.
     
    cxgirl and ulilwitch like this.
  7. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Totally agree, 1920's or so
     
    cxgirl, ulilwitch and Lucille.b like this.
  8. Lucille.b

    Lucille.b Well-Known Member

    Looking at the whole thing, I don't know where you would attach the pendant. Possible they aren't meant to go together?

    blue3.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2020
    ulilwitch and kyratango like this.
  9. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    It looks similar in style but I believe it belongs with some other necklace.
    Also, see these little parts
    IMG_20200906_192140_474.jpg
    I think something was attached to it
     
    cxgirl, KSW, Any Jewelry and 2 others like this.
  10. Debora

    Debora Well-Known Member

    Certainly not 1960s-1970s. And assume you're using box for storage but not original to necklace?

    Debora
     
    KSW, ulilwitch and Lucille.b like this.
  11. stracci

    stracci Well-Known Member

    Maybe two more tassels
     
  12. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Or chain parts, yes
     
    KSW, ulilwitch, kyratango and 2 others like this.
  13. Lucille.b

    Lucille.b Well-Known Member

    Case not original. Just for photo display. (Prepping for Ebay listing. Everything looks so elegant in that case. But good point, I'll remember to say, "case for display only".)

    I think you are right.

    I think I'll sell separately but note the 2nd piece is available in another auction. They were definitely purchased from the same sale, I have a distinct memory of that, but doesn't mean they were meant to go together.
     
    cxgirl, KSW and kyratango like this.
  14. charlie cheswick

    charlie cheswick Well-Known Member

    Lovely, I take it you've considered India for origin ?
     
    KSW, ulilwitch and Lucille.b like this.
  15. Matt Johnson

    Matt Johnson Well-Known Member

    Maybe someone wanted to combine them or wanted to use the pendant as a broche or something. Either way thry are really pretty.
    I don't think it's from India? I'm guessing east Europe, Russia? They have a long filigree tradition. Altho filigree was popular during the victorian era
     
  16. kyratango

    kyratango Bug jewellery addiction!

    Earlier IMHO, rather 1930, very well made:)
    The stone isn’t lapis, but blue dyed jasper called “Swiss Lapis” in jewelry.
    I had a Czech vibe from it... but not sure as you say it is silver:D
     
  17. kyratango

    kyratango Bug jewellery addiction!

  18. antidiem

    antidiem Well-Known Member

    I think original owner lost a tassel (maybe the one on the right tore off?) And possibly then removed the one on the left (with the fastener that isn't bent).
     
  19. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Lucille, shall I give you the address you can send it to?:happy:

    I think the stone is sodalite, which occasionally has red lines as well as some white and black in that gorgeous blue.
    It has a nice age, and if it is German, it could even be slightly older than Art Deco.
     
    singing, Lucille.b and antidiem like this.
  20. antidiem

    antidiem Well-Known Member

    It looks more a Victorian era piece, than flapper inspired, despite a tassel.
     
    Lucille.b and KSW like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page