Antiquers Daily


  • Antiques articles and information
  • Pictures of antiques (lots of them!)
  • Discussions and debates

Enter your email address:




We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will not be shared.

Louis Icart Illusion Print

Discussion in 'Art' started by drg642, Oct 31, 2024.

  1. drg642

    drg642 Well-Known Member

    This Louis Icart Illusion print was purchased from someone who says they bought it at a thrift store, for what that’s worth. I’ve looked at a lot of Illusion prints and etchings on-line and am confused as to what I have and whether it has anything more than decorative value. Any help is appreciated. I am mostly concerned about describing it correctly, and about not selling something as decorative art if it is significantly better than that.

    The image, not including the signature or any margin is 11 x 5 inches, matted it is 19 x 12.5 inches, framed it is 23 x 16.5 inches.

    The image has dots, the numbering does not, and the signature also does not look like it has dots to me.

    I saw 3 other examples that had similar numbering out of 500.

    204/500 is described as “a limited edition serigraph signed by the artist himself, produced in 1940.” It’s on offer on ebay for $639.

    208/500 is described as “a signed Limited Edition Lithograph,” on offer on ebay for $1400.
    Also saw that 208/500 sold at Auctions by the Bay in 2004 for $150, framed similar to mine, described as “offset lithograph printed in colors, signed as part of image, numbered in pencil.”

    125/500 sold at Rogallery, I don’t know for how much, and is described as “a 1990 Giclee, numbered in pencil.” There is also an entry on-line for this item auctioned by Rogallery in 2019, and passed, with an estimate of $700-900.

    My assessment is that I have a nice Limited Edition print, hand numbered in pencil, worth less than the $639 that nobody is buying it for on ebay.

    Any confirmation/correction of what I think would be appreciated. Also, I think the signature is printed, not real, but I would like to understand why the print itself has dots from the printing process while the signature does not.

    If you have read this far, I really appreciate it. Seems like a lot to ask! Thanks for any help or comments.

    aaic1.JPG aaic2.JPG aaic3.JPG aaic3a.JPG aaic4.JPG aaic5.JPG aaic5x.JPG aaic5y.JPG aaic6.JPG aaic7.JPG
     
    Figtree3, wlwhittier and Marote like this.
  2. Roaring20s

    Roaring20s Well-Known Member

    Yep, printed signature.
    These are identical ...
    Screen Shot 2024-10-31 at 6.37.39 PM.png

    PS: The numbering is a gimmick, the frame has more value than the printed image. :artist:
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2024
    Figtree3, verybrad, Marote and 3 others like this.
Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page