Antiquers Daily


  • Antiques articles and information
  • Pictures of antiques (lots of them!)
  • Discussions and debates

Enter your email address:




We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will not be shared.

What did the previous owner do to this refectory table?

Discussion in 'Furniture' started by Bernard, Aug 21, 2020.

  1. Bernard

    Bernard New Member

    82C0117E-2298-485D-A258-FCDBAD9C82C8.jpeg DE834126-14C6-4B4F-A9CB-6D84B6DF6B27.jpeg 0548C99A-CC3D-4634-B14B-A52A1414E8BF.jpeg My wife bought this beautiful Refectory table a while back (say 2 years ago) because of the great shape it is in and it’s narrow top compared to most modern tables. It however came in pieces and we never put it together.

    Well last weekend I did and discovered that the table wobbles much more than it should.

    Upon closer inspection I noticed that it appears to have been altered.

    a. I think the two horizontal long beams right below the top are not original based on the different type of wood.
    b. A very well matched thin wood plate was added on the inside of each top of the main support leg to hide a slot.

    I have two questions:
    1. Do you think I’m right? What was there instead? A single beam that fits in the middle running below the top?

    2. Shall I remove the two plates and install a new beam? I really want to fix the wobble, that’s my main concern.

    Why would someone do this? There are traces of wood glue as well so I think somebody else try to correct the issue.

    Any help is very much appreciated.
     
  2. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    and now you have some idea of why the other guy sold it.........;);):rolleyes:
     
  3. Bernard

    Bernard New Member

    Of course. Which is why it was cheap. I like a challenge though. And it was the reason to sign up for this forum.
     
  4. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    Christmasjoy and Aquitaine like this.
  5. James Conrad

    James Conrad Well-Known Member

    Yes, it's been altered, this photo tells the tale, notice the slot that is missing a beam connecting the 2 legs at top.
    Also, normally you would have an apron around the entire perimeter of table.

    82C0117E-2298-485D-A258-FCDBAD9C82C8.jpeg
     
  6. James Conrad

    James Conrad Well-Known Member

    Here is one on a quicky search, Circa 1900 oak
    Notice the apron, since there are only 2 legs instead of the usual 4 that apron helps a lot structurally.

    Large_18th_century_style_oak_r_as135a3140z-4.jpg
     
    Christmasjoy and komokwa like this.
  7. Bernard

    Bernard New Member

    Thank you James. That makes sense. I’m even wondering if it’s the original top. It seems too thin, but I do like the tiger oak pattern a lot.
     
    Christmasjoy and komokwa like this.
  8. Bernard

    Bernard New Member

    A better picture of the top. Please disregard the chairs.
     

    Attached Files:

    komokwa likes this.
  9. James Conrad

    James Conrad Well-Known Member

    Yes, very nice figure on that quarter sawn oak.
     
    Christmasjoy and komokwa like this.
  10. James Conrad

    James Conrad Well-Known Member

    The thin top is ok, the alteration hurt. The Shaker's made these kinds of tables with no apron, very delicate but solid as a rock.
    Notice the struts underneath tied into the top beam which yours is missing.
    Reproduction of Shaker Trestle table, this one in Birdseye Maple

    906968079a6aa60440ac0d01c37b21c7.jpg
    Griffith_birdseye_trestle_table_three_quarter-1200x844.jpg Griffith_dining_table_birdseye_figure-1200x1200.jpg
     
    Christmasjoy, Fid and komokwa like this.
Write your reply...
Uploads are not available.
Draft saved Draft deleted
Similar Threads: previous owner
Forum Title Date
Furniture Old chair previously restored Dec 23, 2018
Furniture Ignorant Owner Dec 19, 2021
Furniture Inexperienced antique furniture owner/seller seeking advice please. Aug 20, 2021

Share This Page