Unmarked chien blanc ceramic. Is it Nymphenburg?

Some info here from a few years ago that might help.
https://www.antiquers.com/threads/dating-nymphenburg.3918/

 

Looks to me like it's marked just below that bunch of grapes on the base.

 

This seller claims it is:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/629862774/antique-nymphenburg-bacchus-roman-god-of

 

And this one acknowledges the connection to the Auliczek:

https://www.bukowskis.com/en/lots/9...el-after-dominik-auliczek-nymphenburg-germany

 

Want a closer picture of the mark on OP's. That figurine in the second link is not quite the same as this, although very close, and it does have a Nyphenburg mark on the bottom.

 

It looks right to me for Nymphenburg. Lovely quality. Hard to date as they have reused old moulds over the years.

 

I think there's cause to question.


There's a harshness to OP's. The passage that bothers me most is the midriff:

 

As I read the description of the piece at the second link, they are not claiming it is Nymphenburg, only that it is 'after' Auliczek's work. I'm not sure it's the right thing to use for comparison.

 

This may be it:

https://www.rubylane.com/item/6041-PS170102/Pair-Nymphenburg-Porcelain-Figurines-Bacchus-Ceres

 

@sunday silence Your piece is not unmarked:

 

That looks closer. Two figures like that start looking like parts of the four seasons.

 

Could be. Venus for spring & who? for winter? Pluto maybe. Just the 2 of them make a harvest scene.

 

This looks like spring:

https://in.pinterest.com/pin/425730971005605539/

 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/265236134800