I mean the way there is no outline and its sort of cut out of the tourquoise enamel or whatever. Or is that a standard sort of technique? These...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
not sure that crescent mark is a Worcester mark: [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I cant really make out the close up of that mark, will try to get better pictures: [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
also can anyone read the maker's mark? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
no questions I just thought I'd post these. Note the mother dog has a puppy front of her! [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH]
There's another symbol there as well. Any more ideas on maker and age? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
which of these do you think is better? one is by Geenen and the other by Jonge [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I think I've seen this one before... [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
