Hi, your mirrors are Chinese and from the 2nd half of the 20th c. They come in a variety of shapes and materials. It is difficult to see in the...
While this type of ware was made in China from the late 19th c on, the thin translucent enamels of this piece make me think that it was made in...
I see a bit Asian. The bowl itself is Japanese Satsuma earthenware IMO, while the decoration seems to be American. I seems to have been a kind of...
I found a very similar one online and it was dated 19th c. But I find it difficult to put a date on these pieces. It seems to have some age though.
I think it's Japanese Oribe pottery.
IMO it is definitely a Persian plate. The glaze and the foot are very characteristic. Many designs on Persian pottery are imitations of Chinese...
The mark looks like a Meissen Marcolini mark, but the decoration is maybe a bit too sloppy. I guess a Meissen blank decorated by someone else?
I think those were made by a Westerner trying to do something in Japanese style. And certainly 1970.
That is a Ganesha. It seems to be cast, not carved. The swastika exists in many cultures as a symbol.
Hi and welcome, this is indeed an 18th c Chinese blue & white export porcelain plate which has been clobbered. That means that it has been...
In modern Greek this shape is called "stamna" (στάμνα). It is a vessel for carrying water and was used far into the 20th c. I do not know if the...
That mark means "Made in Jingdezhen", "Jingdezhen Nianzhi" and doesn't appear earlier than the second half of the 20th c.
Think Samson, early 20th c.
To me it looks Chinese, like a copy of a Han dynasty stone carving of a procession...
Thank you very much @Figtree3 and @Aznathalie ! That makes sense.
Hi and Happy New Year! I have this bronze candlestick (h: 15 cm) with a cyrillic mark. I tried to read it but could not make much out of it. Could...
It would be nice to see the other side, too. These look Nepalese, the one could be a lotus flower with a book scroll in the blossom, the other...
Oh dear, just to get back to the discussion, IMO there is no reason to assume that this set is not Kutani or Kutani style. I would also not call...
I cannot help with the mark, too, but the figure is Daruma. This looks very Japanese to me, maybe from Kyoto.
Separate names with a comma.
