Pretty set @lvetterli That mark was registered In 1918, and used until the 1940s. Mikey
Thank you for the great information on how they were made. This doesn't look like a glaze to my eyes. But I have been known to be wrong. Mikey
That's awesome news. Thank you all very much! Mikey
Yes the glossy part is raised. I thought the matt was cut into the glaze? Mikey
A little better.. [ATTACH]
Thank you @Potteryplease Yes it's a shadow in my lousy pics. The whole thing is shiny black except for inside the designs. I'll get a better...
That would be nice. Not far from home if it is. I'm in Northern California. Mikey
It's not applied! Mikey
I was hoping someone could tell me about this little piece. It is 2 1/2" tall and about 1 3/4" diameter Signed on the bottom. Mikey [ATTACH]...
Hi all, I picked up this little basket today. measures 3 1/2" diameter wide and is 2 1/2" tall. I hope someone can tell me who made it, and is it...
I figured it was at best honorific It will require more research. There is a major difference in the one found by @Marote and mine. Mine is...
that's great. I've been here for almost 12 years and have 0 best answers. Mikey
I just did. Mikey
Now that would make my little teapot about 200 years old. It is in his style for sure. Mimicking Chinese pottery. Mikey
Awesome! You deserve a best answer for that one @Marote Thank you very much. Mikey
At first, I was thinking Kutani, but the mark is totally wrong. I looked through the G site a couple times. some similar, but similar doesn't work...
Wow, I love all those locks. Mikey
AJ made me blush. Thank you all very much! Mikey
This little 3" incense burner was a gift to me from me. It's really not very old, but like the crossover motif used in Chinese and Japanese...
I've never had someone swear at me on this forum before lol. I sold it yesterday to my neighbor for $20. I only paid 3. Mikey
Separate names with a comma.
