Is there an incised or impressed number ? If no I think it may not be Meissen.
The pieces are English. The shapes of the jug and the sugar box point to a date of c1820. I don't know the maker.
My expert tells me that the saucer is definitely c1700 . He showed me a bowl in his collection with a near identical pattern .
Very logical.
No. Same here.
Thanks. Totally agree.Looks nothing like any of their work.
When I do a reverse image search on this, the results constantly return jugs by Picasso. I know that this is not by him but it is clearly signed...
Thanks again. There are certainly close similarities in style.
Thanks. I'm getting an expert to check it.
Also there seems to be an impressed mark. Any chance of a better photo of it?
I found this porcelain saucer the other day. I feel that it is Japanese and my gut feeling is that it is a very early one. I haven't found another...
I think they are printed possibly hand coloured. Most probably English late 19th century
I would agree late 19th century
Thanks. It’s the same mark as the eBay one but printed on the base not a label and the finish is very similar- paint like.
Hi This huge bowl just arrived. I bought it as a “ceramic” bowl although I suspected it was glass. It has no translucency due to a coating on...
Solved it Alfred Renoleau. [ATTACH] https://www.alienor.org/collections-des-musees/fiche-personne-9547-renoleau-alfred
Any ideas on this little faience plate (18cm or 7” diameter)? I imagine it is French but the signature is not in my book. Thanks in advance John...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] I am pretty sure that this is a Meissen Marcolini period c1780 biscuit porcelain cup and saucer with...
I rather stupidly forgot that I have a book on pate sur pate . Seem that it may be by Alphonse Lamarre 1878 [ATTACH]
Japanese
Separate names with a comma.