Yes that's the direction I'm looking in now. It's nothing special but it is a novelty.
It's not the same. You sometimes see this described as Kyoto Satsuma ware. It doesn't look fake and I think it will date to the second half of the...
I love this.
The damage may detract from its value quite heavily. Is it definitely hand painted? Hard to tell from the photos but if it is, it's nicely done.
Yes it does look quite old. Be good to see a photo side on. I'm thinking majolica probably English c1850-1890 but in the absence of any marks...
Without marks it is going to be difficult to pin down the exact factory but I imagine all are English Staffordshire and date from around the third...
Great. I will give it a try.
By the way there's a Dom Perignon ashtray included that I've found online for what I paid for the whole lot to US$195
Thanks. I will give the decanter a wash tomorrow. The stopper does't wobble. I found the exact dish described as Hoja. Thanks for Alum Bay i.d.
Thanks. That's a big help.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] Here’s an unusual piece. It’s quite crude in decoration but I feel it’s quite early due to the entirely hand painted...
I've mentioned before that I usually stick with ceramics but there was little on offer at last week’s auction which was held online only with no...
I’d expect to see that in an antique shop over here for about £30 ( not that they would get it)
I’m sure that these are original .
I tend to agree. Yours ticks all the boxes in that description
Here's something I found with similar decoration. That seller may not be right but worth a look...
Here’s a fuller description of differences http://printedbritishpotteryandporcelain.com/what-did-they-make/pottery-item/saucer-19
The description explains the differences between the two so it could very well be Caughley If Kate’s fish is thin it’s Worcester but if it is...
I found this about the differences between Worcester and Caughley's versions of The Fisherman pattern on York Museum website Tea bowl and saucer...
Those look like typical park finds. More comfortable with 19th-20th c pendant now. The patina had me fooled as it looks very much like a Roman...
Separate names with a comma.
