I knew I had seen this before. This is a modern print of a portion of a painting held at the Met. Consequently, doubt it is Mr. Nakamura's...
Looks factory to me.
Exactly, just utilitarian. Fulper is collected primarily for their glazes. Even identical forms will vary quite a bit in value dependent on...
While legitimate Fulper, this is not the kind of Fulper pottery collectors want. I collect Fulper but would pass this by regardless of price....
I also think Egyptian and not terribly old. Looks like brass with some selective plating. Think the work was machine embossed. Not terribly...
Circa 1920, T-back. Looks like ash. Not a lot of value so freecycle works.
Have had several pieces of Monterey and have never gotten more than $100.00 for any of them. Just not valued here. Too big to mess with shipping...
Ditto what Ghopper said. Would expect better quality carving if earlier.
Have seen similar if not exact. The smoked glass globes make me think c. 1970.
Variation on a Windsor chair. Think 30s or so. Value is nil in this condition. Having a new rush seat put on would exceed value even without...
Not antique since not 100 years old. Think you are about right in the dating but would think post-war. Similar to Monterey but doesn't match....
Have seen some large Vanguard Studios paintings but none in this long narrow configuration. The largest I have seen are more like 60" x 48" or...
I think old Japanese. Arita ware? Top probably made or found to fit, to replace a broken one. Base is more generic and newer. Base may be Chinese.
I think F.I. Comely. Work is naive so probably a Sunday painter.
Agree with a teens-20s date. Have not seen a back quite like that. Sort of an exaggerated T-back style. Here is a more typical T-back from the...
I am with Johnny on this. Wood could be maple. Here is something similar to what the whole thing would have looked like. [IMG]
Could also be a hobbyist piece. Condition of the interior makes this virtually worthless. Can be cleaned to bare metal with hydrochloric acid...
Turn of the century on this so, yes, antique. Value is in the frame.
Agree, naive. This was done by someone using established art constructions and materials.
Have not seen this type of attachment before. Would think at least as old as 1850. Could very well be a few decades earlier. Hard to tell wood...
Separate names with a comma.
