Several sold on ebay. Should at least give you an idea of value....
Yep … water damaged/warped. Circa 1940, I would think. could attempt to straighten but doubt the results would be all that satisfactory. May...
Don't think it is a marriage. Just looks odd by American standards. Have seen other European pieces with narrow tops and wide bases. Could be...
Also think 60s-70s. Really doesn't look like it needs something as drastic as sanding.
Think you did fine considering condition
Could see how this could be a silver weighted stick missing its bottom and, consequently, its mark. I would scratch heavily in to that bottom and...
Last similar lamp table (more art deco than yours) I had here in my Midwest retail location sold for $45.00.
Most certainly a reproduction. Based on what I can see in these pics (not much), think it could be a later Asian import.
Agree with the above … Circa 1850.
Absolutely not late 1800s since electric lighting was in its infancy then. Have seen a lot of these from the 30s-40s. Usually more art deco in...
Late 19th to early 20th century. Part of a parlor set. Quality seems a step above the typical mail-order sets from the time. What do you know of...
French glass and assembled in Holland. Modern decorative lamp. Pretty but not really collectible at this stage of its life. Value is in its...
Interesting that they specifically call the vase Rookwood but not the owl......
Think more 30s or so. Weird combination of Spanish meets US Colonial. In the US?
Late 30s-40s and a mish-mash of styles. The plug is a common replacement type available for decades. Hard to tell wood from these pics. Either...
Link? I could not find it. Rago should be an authoritative source.
Not Rookwood. My guess would be European in origin. Belgium? Holland? Possibly even English.
That is a Rookwood mark but something about this piece seems decidedly un-Rookwood-like. Their later work was different but I have not seen any...
I get the feeling that this is a relatively new item. Crackling of the paint appears artificial. Form seems wrong for an old piece. More...
Not a painting. Looks like a serigraph.
Separate names with a comma.
