If there’s no facility for a lid, I’d think it’s less likely to be for condiments, in that case.
Missing a lid, hm?
Agreed, that’s a much later doll. The fabric is a huge clue.
Not a votive, too early for that. They weren’t a thing, proper candles were. Spills possibly.
I’ve got a pair, and yes, climbers.
It’s been used in jewellery since the sixties, I think. Nice, isn’t it.
Nope, I’m thinking a big bar top spittoon.
I’ve had the best hangovers in Glasga’. Much of my dna originated there.
Very common in the nineteenth century to do that.
A proper Georgian one looks handcrafted, with each individual protuberance properly delineated. I don’t think this is that. It’s pretty and wearable.
The green is fibre optic.
Churned butter had a lot of whey, hence the drainer.
That colour does look more eighties, doesn’t it.
They also got revived in the eighties. I’ve them from both dates.
If you’re looking at transfer printing, have a look at bat printing too.
Not meat, those aren’t round. Too big for butter. Looks like a spittoon lid to me.
They look moulded rather than carved.
Often used for acid here. Glass making.
Emboli is a good bet.
The back is probably silvered, like an old mirror. That breaks down.
Separate names with a comma.