Wow. I hadn’t had time to do any research yet. They are definitely old. Right On! Didn’t see a mark but I’ll check again.
Ok, thank you. Things are making more sense now.
Sorry. I got one response stating it may be best to leave it be and others saying to take it out.
Ran across some old pins in a wooden box. I know they made a lot of most of em so they’re generally not worth much but thought a few of them were...
So I’m wondering whether I should taking the backing off and remove the print or leave it alone. I suppose one of the factors here would be the...
I’ll bet some folks in the hi-if market would dig it.
Here’s the frame. Love this frame. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Roger that! It did seem flat as I remember it, and thank you again!
I’m not with the print now, it did look sepia toned to me. I’ll have to check it out this weekend, I’ll try to remember to bring a loupe. Maybe...
Beautiful! And GREAT photography!
Thank you for the explanation, I appreciate it. Any idea on what kind of print this is or when it was done? Would I need to remove it from the frame?
The faces in the original seem to have more individual character than the repro. Also, what’s strange to me(about both) is the sumptuous white...
...chicken dinner!! Thank You!!
[ATTACH]
Not that I could see. I was not comfortable taking it out of the frame, seems to be backed with some odd, fragile, almost cardboard looking...
I wonder if it’s a generic, “In the Style of” that was made just to reproduce and was never an “actual painting”?
Are the holes in the base for tieing it together with the top on so it can be hung/suspended?
I’m bummed it’s damaged. It’s not my normal cup of tea but it’s sort of growing on me.
That does look like a tuning fork.
Anyone recognize this? It’s under glass, some kind of lithograph or print/copy. Thank You! [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
