Base looks French to me and the glass looks bohemian. Mid to late nineteenth.
That’s early. As in late eighteenth into early nineteenth century. Might be Coalport.
Georgian glass is typically greyish.
Merci beaucoup! I’ve seen imitation registry diamonds, but they’re usually way more fake than this. I’d think the transcription was a bit off....
Good spot on the maker, Cheryl. I’m surprised it doesn’t have Swiss hallmarks.
The setting will be twenties or early thirties. that’s a nice seal.
An abbreviation for dessin deposee then no or number 20162. Design registered in English. A French maker took the trouble to register the design...
The watch is American, it says 18k not ct. The chain may therefore also be ten K, which was an American standard. Some British hallmarked gold...
I should have said. Yes, early twentieth.
Ooh, covet much. I’d agree it’s twenties with that frame.
Transfers with a wee bit of hand embellishment. we did embossed numbers as well, and also used furrin type names as pattern names.
I don’t think British, fwiw. I do think of some decent age.
There’s not much differentiation on bling. More on furniture, oddly.
Amen to that. I’ve had more good stuff from the clueless Clever Blokes who only know British hallmarks….. I cite Neiger beads for one whole quid.
It would be elm here. Lovely thing.
And the rest!
Victoria came to the throne in 1837. Before her, her uncle William IV had a short reign, from 1830. So Georgian is 1830 at the latest.
Some dealer or other would have originated the name.
That’s high Victorian, mid nineteenth would make sense.
The ones which show up here are seventeenth century ish. Not high value, because so many were made.
Separate names with a comma.
