Taking off foreign, I’ve just had an American chap on Facebook describe Leerdam glass as being Scandinavian from the Netherlands. I despair.
Lion is late nineteenth ish. Some kind of heraldic thing going on.
This is the kind of discussion I love. Setting an object in the context of history and geography.
And in a timely manner, this article was in the Sunday Times yesterday. Odd earrings are a Thing. [ATTACH]
There you go! it might be Sanyu, but there’s a more obvious maker, my brain isn’t working yet....
I’m seeing 585 in that small mark and 830. That implies either a mix of gold and silver or plated. But we do indeed need the whole thing.
The flower beads on the earrings might be Italian. The rest could be from oh, Germany, the U.K., Czechoslovakia. I think the pendant is glass, yes.
It’s Japanese, that shape is typical.
I’d think the little pendant is thirties. Might have been part of something else. The clip backs on those earrings and the style suggest fifties...
Hah, I’ve one very similar. Tunbridge Ware.
It’s Walther Glas. I’ve had a matching bowl. Lovely colours too.
I’d agree on eighteenth for the wee jug. Wondering if the plate is Coalport.
I’ve seen Scottish hardstone sell for astonishing high prices. We’re rich!
Wirkkala was designing for them in the sixties, I can’t recall the exact date. This is sixties, from memory.
It’s not early. Might even be early twentieth.
Now I’ve seen the close up, not spills. As others have said, cheaply made so it’s a “flaw”.
I’d not use basic commercial bins.
I’ve a lot of show cards and posters, I collect the ones with family members on. This looks right for early sixties in terms of colour and...
The butterfly looks like Japanese damascene.
That round one looks Georgian to my eye.
Separate names with a comma.
