Here you go @BoudiccaJones ! Long time since I undressed a Sindy.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Hm. I'm also wondering if it's a decorated blank.
I'd forgotten the reflecting globe thing, thanks aj. I'm pretty sure it isn't a marriage. All of the components fit absolutely perfectly: screw...
Don't get me started.
A fair bit of British stuff used impressed numbers, too.
I'd think sixties or seventies from the colour. It does remind me of some Poole, which can be unmarked.
Oo, thanks. Windmill is a great term.
She is indeed a Sindy. I had that exact outfit, but my Sindy had brown hair.
This thing is seriously strange and I'd welcome opinions. I'd think late 19th, but why all the knobs and bits? And the base has fixing holes -...
And then this for fifty pence. It's one of those Bradford Exchange ones, which they charge almost a hundred quid for! WHA'? [ATTACH]
I've been chanelling my inner @BoudiccaJones [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
An annoyingly familiar flower in bud, about to pop.
It's one of those where you need to look at the whole set, if that makes sense!
I don't think those are 2004 with that style and box. A 2004 mark ought to have 925 as well, and would not be a crown. I'm with 1922.
Start at a tenner each and haggle. ;)
Correct, these are properly hallmarked silver.
I think older.
Anyone who says jasperware is interior glazed is clueless.
I'm inclined to fifties Empoli.
I'd add that it's only jewellery which has hallmarks.
Separate names with a comma.
