Hm. There goes my reputation. ;) Gut feel is too thick, too heavy and not detailed enough for S&W or another nineteenth century Stourbridge...
The glass looks a bit thick for Loetz to my eye.
It might be a duty stamp. That looks like a Bilston type enamel to me.
Amen, sisters!
They taste nice, too.
I suspect the first is Belgian or French.
Not matches, no rough surface. Might have been for a calendar.
Italian.
Claret jug, strictly speaking. Missing a stopper, late 19th.
I'd forgotten all that. ;) The end is good!
Hm. If I saw those here, I'd think Continental.
I don't know why I ignored it before, and I have NO idea where I got it! The one benefit of lockdown has been much sorting and tidying. You should...
I've been sorting boxes. Unearthed this, which I had sort of dismissed, then took a better look at. The beads are really decent, it may well be...
The problem is so many did that beehive thing.
The lovely seller is normally an art director and has picked up all sorts of things to use as props. She did really good photos, too.
I'd thought Indian, too.
@Marko - I've a couple of butterflies like your Monet bee, with those lace wings, it was a bit of a thing for them.
It's one of those beehive marks.
I'd call it a cross, yes. And garnets.
You let your children sleep in the HOUSE? Blimey.
Separate names with a comma.
