True!
I'd say spot on. Majolica is the right term. They're lovely.
It may not be the specific ones, but the designs, if you see what I mean.
You get a PRIZE! ;)
In antiqes terms, we are far more specific over here. So, something made in the early 1830s would be called William IV.
Ooh. I bet that was fun.
I do indeed do Facebook. I'll try that, good thought. Thank you.
I think the fixings are al wrong for a belt buckle.
I'd be using vinegar, that's verdigris. Costume.
You've had fun! ;) Really interesting. That first Afghan bead is very close.
Me too.
Certainly a dress clip, one of a pair.
I'd say BC jade. I saw these on sale out there: apparently, much of the carving is done in China, from what the fellow at the HUGE jade shop told be.
1930s Czech/Bohemian. It's most likely to be a dress clip with the clip missing, it's typical of the shape. Belt buckles had an integrated slot or...
I think core formed could work: the banding on these is latitidunal, as it were. But yes, they're wound not drawn.
I bought webbing for Ercol chairs from these people: https://ercolstraps.co.uk/ I realise yours is Parker Knoll, but they were incredibly helpful.
Et bien, nous sommes les rosbifs, n'est ce pas?
@Northern Lights Lodge . Leslie, not drilled but formed. Looks as though they were blown round a form: they are as rounded inside as out. But not...
Poms aren't French, it's what Aussies call Brits. French are known as frogs, if you're being impolite.
My first thought was Czech glass and I should have said that. With that length, yes, older.
Separate names with a comma.
