They're decorative, so there's certainly value.
@daveydempsey - love the lamp. There's a fair few clubs it might be.
They may well be diamonds. Danbury et al use little almost industrial grade chips, and glue them.
Sadly, you'd not get a lot on Ebay - I'd keep it and use it, far too pretty not to.
I'd be looking at Japan. The reason they aren't Murano is as others have said, including that ground unpolished base.
Coalport, I reckon.
MArk looks like a daffodil.
Not always.
That looks like a Bilston made enamel plaque from the inside of a snuff box. Might be a lid but naughty images were usually inside. Late 18th,...
Those plaques are pate sure pate. Possibly Schafer und Vater, although the colours look more French.
I'll bet L/S means large size. That's very similar to much 1930s ware here. Flowers are iris. Poole and Beswick both did shapes of this sort, but...
1930s, I'd agre. That looks like the George VI crest. May not have a pattern name: those are ox eye daisies.
Depends where you are. In perfect condition in the UK, perhaps up to fifty pounds retail on a good day.
Journeymen marks is also entirely feasible. It's how people got paid, too.
I've had early 20th C and older silver rings with gap bands. And seen very ancient ones, gold, with gaps. As others have said, doesn't mean new,...
Dragons breath, hm?
The k may be for matching the base, rim and stopper up. The silversmith didn't make the glass and it's possible the cutter was a third party, too.
Most Indian colonial silver is unmarked. You have to have seen a bit to recognise it, or have a look at online images. Yours sounds more like an...
Hm. The pin back and hinge are late 19th, but I think the brooch may actually be far older. Someone has taken an ancient pennanular and modified it.
I have just spent a splendid hour or so pawing through my Box of Delights. Thank you SO much. Lovely bling, pretty well all hoardable. ;)
Separate names with a comma.
