Aha. Thank you - looking at the font, I reckon that Facebook page is the one. Much obliged!
I'd agree on the locks being missing. I think it had no handles, but used the key to open. I also think early 20th or even late 19th.
I do love Persian enamels Millefiori! And also a bracelet that is far too well made to be base metal. But is unmarked. Each segment is separately...
Keeping this. Very heavy necklace, very well made, seller rekoned she paid a fair bit for it, but she would say that. Problem is the tag just says...
You're very welcome, it's a lovely thing.I like researching . ;) I'll be interested to know what he says.
It's begonia grandiflora, to be precise. ;) I think that price is a tad optimistic but it's saleable certainly.
Tumbleweed?
Late 19th C English majolica by the look of it.
It's most certainly pre CITES and pre 1947 if that helps.
Not me! And not all cut to clear is cased glass, it can be flashed.
So, I had a trawl through Hajdamach's 20th C Glass, Andy McConnell's new Decanter book and my Big Expensive Whitefriars book. Nada. This thing is...
That brooch back is late 19th into early 20th. Navy never had hats like that. My first thought was cricket, possibly a school team.
Thirded. Absoutely typical.
That's super. I'd agree on 1950s and it says Ciao in its native tongue.
Separate names with a comma.
