thanks for all these tips on the nomenclature. nice.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
one of the listings said the other colors are enamel that are added later. No?
thank you so much for the link. That one is Copeland from about 1850 the one above is Copeland Garrett about 10 years previous I think
its Copeland & Garrett but I have not seen this pattern. would you call it polychrome?
also can anyone read the maker's mark? [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Did not know that
Getting back to these. At first I think there's no way. People have trouble keeping their staffordshire spaniel pairs together for 150 years. How...
no questions I just thought I'd post these. Note the mother dog has a puppy front of her! [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
any more thoughts on this one? The artist does not seem to come up. Teheran or Teheren or Teherenz.
I now have it in my hands. It's a sugar bowl, yes? It lacks a cut out section of the lid for a spoon but I think its a sugar.
Back to this: is it fair to describe this one as "gaudy imari?"
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Thank you I think you're right
[ATTACH]
well I guess its parian ware now that I think about it
another site says this is a copy of Ludwigsburg mark by Carl Thieme in the 1980s. Scroll down to the mark on the lower right:...
there seem to be impressed marks near the top edge of third pic. Can you get better pic?
Separate names with a comma.