What i think is that the photo's mislead allot because of the lighting. So here are new photo's, let me know if the opinions are still the...
and the bronze is coming through like a yellow color and i believe that on a real one you have more red and green patination and not the bronze...
PS if i have offended someone with my opinions please tell me. I don't want to offend anyone.
well i posted it on a selling platform and within minutes a serious bronze dealer reacted and asked what i wanted.And he asks high prices for his...
that blob is a casting imperfection which was later also filed smooth. bronze casting in the 16th to the 18th century was not always done...
thats not entirely correct see here a bronze religious plaque of the 15th/16th century and it has also rough file marks.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
those are defently file marks, and 17th and 18th century pieces have the same file marks. here is one with only one side decorated but mine is...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] the point of antiquers is that i now know it's modern.
thank you nice cross yes and almost all so called old crosses are modern replica's
how old could this bronze cross be?[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
could this be the horn one. not the white tooth...
yes that look allot like yours.
thatś wright slag glass is mostly not transparent because it is waste glas from metal processing. so no ordinary glass
it is slag glass form england. here is another type of that. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/165328731717 and here is a piece of victorian slag glass...
what do you think about this one, interesting paterns[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
as far as i can observe yours seems to be made of glass not stone, so itś a european scarab. it has been cast you can see that when you look at...
the white one is defently a tooth because it still has the roots and has a tooth cavety.[ATTACH]
the tooth is round and not flat and has no serrated edges. here a photo of the side[ATTACH]
will do that
thanks will tell him
Separate names with a comma.
