Looks Like some letters/writing around the top part. Also, it reminds me of some metal work pieces like Indian enamelled brass work, but I dunno...
Minton or Wedgwood would be marked — latter half of 19th c and I’m thinking a Staffordshire factory likely. It is nicely done.
Gee, I’m thinking brick clay, too. Owls were a popular decorative motif in the 60s and 70s, yes. Do I see some felt pen marks or brush ink marks...
Marks and Spencer’s = Marks and Sparks as I have heard it called. I’m with Ownedbybear and would clean it up and leave it at that.
Lots of Aynsley in Canada. At that date, it would have had a stamp on the bottom. I have seen earlier Aynsley pieces with an impressed AYNSLEY,...
Thanks, Fid. When my brain feels up to reading French, I’ll have a good look-see!
Gee, I thought Barbotine had big applied flowers and such.
Yes, if you’ve seen other genuine Meissen pieces with that type of impressed numbers, go with it. I often muse aloud, er, a-type!
Enlarging it gets me LABEL or possibly LABEC, neither of which makes much sense.
Unfortunately, I have found in the past that values are not all that great for modernish Russian porcelain. But I like it.
Er...ummm...ahhh...eek... :smuggrin:
The crossed swords mark looks correct, but those impressed numbers are giving me pause and the modelling of the hands is not quite top notch. Not...
No, not capodimonte.
I’ve always considered Chinese porcelain and pottery not for the faint of heart collectors as IDing can be a bit of a minefield. That said, if...
Maybe Iouatio. I think this is fairly modern faience.
Figurine looks like a Hummel/Goebel product. The tile or perhaps trivet is sweet but dunno who dunnit.
I don’t see any photos. :oops:
For British marks, Godden’s is pretty much the gold standard. There are lots of useful webisites. www.porcelainmarksandmore.com for German...
How bid is it? Could be a covered butter dish...
Just glue it so you can display it. Yes, a pretty piece.
Separate names with a comma.
