I think the Native American ones are done by an amateur/student, but the others do look like more professional.
Cool!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/01/07/publisher-renames-joseph-conrad-classic-n-word-narcissus/ Ahahahahaha! :hilarious:
I don't see Af's rubbish post, but the dish is likely Japanese -- the shield mark (beehive) mark was/is copied/faked by many. Not Austrian.
Birdy, please come back to this thread and update us when it's sold. :)
These stenciled designs seem to date late 19th/early 20th c. most often.
:eek:
Just musing, but I wonder if the glass inserts could act like bobeches and turn the vases into candlesticks? Maybe not...
Wow, this is an interesting thread! Thanks to Bob, I read The Arcanum: Extraordinary True Story of the Invention of European Porcelain by Janet...
Ah, thanks for the history lesson Mansons and Af! So, by the time I was born, napkin rings were pretty much useless! But I'll keep 'em anyway. ;)
No dip or or point like the anchor punch -- looks most like the 1848 or 1899 letter Z in a square with corners cut off. No monarch's head though,...
Found this googling Anund's hint: http://www.jaunesetvertes.com/products.php?categories_id=4&products_id=160
Thanks for the chesterfield knock-knock jokes and the definitions. But here in Canuck-land, anything that resembles a couch or sofa is called a...
I believe I have seen Thomas Kinkade jigsaw puzzles. :beaver:
LOL, nope, no napkin rings from the Norwegian side, Cheryl! (I often bought stuff for my Mom that I liked, too, LOL!) The engraving on the Hroar...
Does no one use the term "chesterfield" in the States?
Here's google images for redware pottery:...
You know me, Messi, just flapping my gums, er, fingers again! ;)
No idea, but could be Canadian -- if so, likely a Toronto maker. Can't quite get the year right for the English one -- 1848? But no monarch's...
Couldn't help myself -- had to shine the silver one: [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
