In that photo, doesn't he look very Jimmy Carter-ish? [ATTACH]
If you like it and you're happy with the purchase, that's really all that matters. Congrats on the family.
I am aware of what “after” usually means in artwork, but I don’t think that is the case here. In this instance I think it is merely an imprecise...
I like it.
The portraits are mezzotints by Charles François Gabriel Levachez (1760-1820)...
The picture of the interior makes it look like there's a button on the bottom. Is that true?
This notation from an 1847 book catalog might refer to a portfolio of prints of which these were part: [ATTACH] (don't know that for sure) It's...
Victims of the revolution? The first is King Louis XVI and the event is the storming of the Tuileries Palace, which really marked the end of the...
sealing wax etui?
Congrats @gregsglass. I forgot. Maybe he did too.
I think an amateur effort. It's improperly stretched. A proper stretcher is held together by the tension of the canvas. This is just stapled(?)...
Show the back of the piece. If you can, get a good, sharp close-up of a corner. Given the thickness, I would guess its on card, of which there...
Sounds probable that the painting has been trimmed.
What's the purpose of the question? I would assume the images have been copied over time, but you know what they say about assumptions. Apart...
Sure... toss my name in as well. I like the color.
Happens to me all the time. It's because the pic is so big, your computer simply won't bother. Right click on the space and you'll get a view...
If you are satisfied that it is a reproduction, then just call it a lithographic reproduction of a painting.
I have this incredibly rare quarter. Never seen another like it. It's made of plastic! [ATTACH] (Secretly, I suspect it may be fake.)
My guess would be around 1900. But there was something of a post WWII revival.
Is there such a thing as a chatelaine necessaire?
Separate names with a comma.
