We will do! Not in great hope but for certainty :)
Messilane is probably right and so are you. But not the time to take issue with the owner (who was present but not involved) who is closing the...
Jeweller (young girl) was dismissive, didnt know the metal, (probably base she thought) but thought that stone was glass.
I was going to say I preferred an old jug.
There isn't a China stamp on this one. TBH, one ring looks much like another to me. Much prefer an old pitcher ;)
That doesn't happen to us..... One day maybe :)
I think it a reflection, cant see anything with naked eye
not from this angle :) [IMG]
Found in cigarette card lot knotted to a trifari necklace. The only mark visible is the triangular cartouche (see photo). The "jewel" is about...
Spot on Gila! While I can sympathise with the Shoji Hamada view that his work should not require a mark to be identified as his, studio pottery is...
Susan, the link you gave was for a registered design number. I think the patent is for 1921 and is as follows 1921 patent:180,678. Blanc, L. May...
Thoughts on this plate welcomed, repair suggests not later than 19th century. [IMG] [IMG]
Here you go :) [IMG]
Thanks King, now for the maker ;)
Possibly a nautilus, found one other example on Ebay UK attributed to Sowerby but have been unable to verify. It has no markings, 4.5 inches tall...
Hi, detailed patent info
I think something got lost in translation!
Haven't had chance to research it properly yet but I think it may be a bit later, early 19th C.
Hmmm. Thought this little beauty was a modern miniature vase until I looked a bit closer. [IMG] [IMG]
All that makes sense, but the photos on the site link I gave show crockery on the U boats
Separate names with a comma.
