Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
58 q-tips, 3 hours of polishing, worth every minute
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="silverthwait, post: 542533, member: 103"]Ahem! As yet, I have not teased out from anywhere the information I want about sugar bowls -- so if anyone can help, please do. </p><p><br /></p><p>Obviously, once sugar no longer needed to be wrestled away from a solid cone shape, the sugar bowl came into existence. Some had lids which helped during damp, or humiditous weather. But not all bowls had them. And, during the Victorian Age of huge families and porridge-for-breakfast, the bowls became quite large. (So much so, that people today often don't know what they were for.) Hence also the sugar spoon, same length (or slightly more) than a teaspoon. </p><p><br /></p><p>The problem is that, today, sugar bowls are smaller. They are larger than a coffee cup, but nowhere near the Victorian ones. Unfortunately, the sugar spoon did not change to comlement the new bowl. So now we have a sugar bowl with a tall spoon poking out like a mast on a schooner.</p><p><br /></p><p>Nor has the matter of the little cutout for the spoon been solved. If it is there, one has to figure out not only where to put the lid while using, but how to gracefully rectify the sugar lumps from humidity. </p><p><br /></p><p>I have solved but one of these difficulties. Instead of the official sugar spoon which came with my pattern, I use a baby feeding spoon -- the short-handled one with the rounded bowl.</p><p><br /></p><p>End of the Sugar Bowl Treatise.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="silverthwait, post: 542533, member: 103"]Ahem! As yet, I have not teased out from anywhere the information I want about sugar bowls -- so if anyone can help, please do. Obviously, once sugar no longer needed to be wrestled away from a solid cone shape, the sugar bowl came into existence. Some had lids which helped during damp, or humiditous weather. But not all bowls had them. And, during the Victorian Age of huge families and porridge-for-breakfast, the bowls became quite large. (So much so, that people today often don't know what they were for.) Hence also the sugar spoon, same length (or slightly more) than a teaspoon. The problem is that, today, sugar bowls are smaller. They are larger than a coffee cup, but nowhere near the Victorian ones. Unfortunately, the sugar spoon did not change to comlement the new bowl. So now we have a sugar bowl with a tall spoon poking out like a mast on a schooner. Nor has the matter of the little cutout for the spoon been solved. If it is there, one has to figure out not only where to put the lid while using, but how to gracefully rectify the sugar lumps from humidity. I have solved but one of these difficulties. Instead of the official sugar spoon which came with my pattern, I use a baby feeding spoon -- the short-handled one with the rounded bowl. End of the Sugar Bowl Treatise. :)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Silver
>
58 q-tips, 3 hours of polishing, worth every minute
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...