Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Any Jewelry, post: 13243670, member: 2844&quot;]Ditto. The Tang geese I found were also more detailed. Like this one:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.alaintruong.com/archives/2015/09/04/32580638.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.alaintruong.com/archives/2015/09/04/32580638.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.alaintruong.com/archives/2015/09/04/32580638.html</a></p><p>(Scroll down the page a bit.)</p><p><br /></p><p>The Chinese have copied pieces from earlier period for centuries, it is part of their appreciation of history.</p><p>Here is a later one with less detail than the Tang geese, said to be Kangxi:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2011/02/14/foto/i_capolavori_in_porcellana_dell_arte_cinese-12447334/9/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2011/02/14/foto/i_capolavori_in_porcellana_dell_arte_cinese-12447334/9/" rel="nofollow">https://milano.repubblica.it/cronaca/2011/02/14/foto/i_capolavori_in_porcellana_dell_arte_cinese-12447334/9/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Less detail than the Tang pieces, but still more than on your goose, and made of white clay.</p><p><br /></p><p>Yours was approved for export, which means the authorities didn&#039;t think it historically important. But it also wasn&#039;t a modern mass produced piece, otherwise they wouldn&#039;t have bothered with the seal.</p><p>Maybe yours is late Qing, which is antique, just not Tang and not important for them to keep it. Late Qing is just a guess though.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in