Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Figtree3, post: 515171, member: 33&quot;]Note that moreotherstuff included a link about carbon prints. I think he was indicating that the ones with two sheets were possibly related to the tricolor carbon process, and could be an early version (experimentation?) with that process. I&#039;m not sure about that exactly, since the tricolor process involves taking color on a tissue and adhering it to the negative. (He was also commenting on the other one as being carbon...)</p><p><br /></p><p>History of Carbon Printing:</p><p><a href="http://www.alternativephotography.com/a-brief-history-of-carbon-printing/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.alternativephotography.com/a-brief-history-of-carbon-printing/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternativephotography.com/a-brief-history-of-carbon-printing/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>Technical description that includes description of the tricolor process:</p><p><a href="http://www.alternativephotography.com/the-carbon-transfer-process/" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.alternativephotography.com/the-carbon-transfer-process/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternativephotography.com/the-carbon-transfer-process/</a></p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not saying that these are not carbon. They may very well be. I&#039;ve never seen anything like this. Am thinking about asking some photo history experts on Facebook about this. [USER=10012]@Gus Tuason[/USER] , would you give permission for me to ask them?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in