Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Cameo, for Bronwen opinion!
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 304657, member: 5833"]Over the past weekend, some other possibilities for the identity of these figures came to my attention when a contact expressed doubts about the accuracy of the auction description for this cameo:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/chiswick-auctions/catalogue-id-srchis10431/lot-95dddd16-dc8a-41b5-8b1e-a82c0101e76d" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/chiswick-auctions/catalogue-id-srchis10431/lot-95dddd16-dc8a-41b5-8b1e-a82c0101e76d" rel="nofollow">https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/chiswick-auctions/catalogue-id-srchis10431/lot-95dddd16-dc8a-41b5-8b1e-a82c0101e76d</a></p><p>[ATTACH=full]99878[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>The auction house has high hopes for it based on the histories of 2 others, one of which fetched a whopping amount at Christie's in 2004, although I do not know if it did as well at Sotheby's 10 years later:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.christies.com/Lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?hdnSaleID=18698&LN=63&intsaleid=18698&sid=1bb6d40b-2765-40ba-bf5d-c76ac3732d78" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.christies.com/Lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?hdnSaleID=18698&LN=63&intsaleid=18698&sid=1bb6d40b-2765-40ba-bf5d-c76ac3732d78" rel="nofollow">http://www.christies.com/Lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?hdnSaleID=18698&LN=63&intsaleid=18698&sid=1bb6d40b-2765-40ba-bf5d-c76ac3732d78</a></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2014/arts-islamic-world-l14220/lot.126.html" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2014/arts-islamic-world-l14220/lot.126.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2014/arts-islamic-world-l14220/lot.126.html</a></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]99879[/ATTACH] </p><p>The other was also auctioned by Sotheby's:</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.sothebys.com/es/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.123.html/2012/an-eye-for-opulence-art-of-the-ottoman-empire" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="http://www.sothebys.com/es/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.123.html/2012/an-eye-for-opulence-art-of-the-ottoman-empire" rel="nofollow">http://www.sothebys.com/es/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.123.html/2012/an-eye-for-opulence-art-of-the-ottoman-empire</a></p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]99883[/ATTACH] </p><p>Hayreddin Barbarossa is the favored candidate for all 3 cameos: [ATTACH]99882[/ATTACH] and the one that did so fabulously well at Christie's is a pretty good fit. As an alternative for their other one, Sotheby's suggested Muhiddin Piri Reis (there are multiple ways of transliterating & punctuating this name): [ATTACH]99884[/ATTACH] </p><p>Guess everyone finds a pirate more alluring than a navigator/cartographer, so of course the latest one is being represented as Barbarossa.</p><p><br /></p><p>All three have been described as 16th century agate. I have a very different opinion as to materials used and age, so am very glad I did not pay anywhere near as much - by orders of magnitude - for my turbanned guy![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 304657, member: 5833"]Over the past weekend, some other possibilities for the identity of these figures came to my attention when a contact expressed doubts about the accuracy of the auction description for this cameo: [URL]https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/chiswick-auctions/catalogue-id-srchis10431/lot-95dddd16-dc8a-41b5-8b1e-a82c0101e76d[/URL] [ATTACH=full]99878[/ATTACH] The auction house has high hopes for it based on the histories of 2 others, one of which fetched a whopping amount at Christie's in 2004, although I do not know if it did as well at Sotheby's 10 years later: [URL]http://www.christies.com/Lotfinder/lot_details.aspx?hdnSaleID=18698&LN=63&intsaleid=18698&sid=1bb6d40b-2765-40ba-bf5d-c76ac3732d78[/URL] [URL]http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2014/arts-islamic-world-l14220/lot.126.html[/URL] [ATTACH=full]99879[/ATTACH] The other was also auctioned by Sotheby's: [URL]http://www.sothebys.com/es/auctions/ecatalogue/lot.123.html/2012/an-eye-for-opulence-art-of-the-ottoman-empire[/URL] [ATTACH=full]99883[/ATTACH] Hayreddin Barbarossa is the favored candidate for all 3 cameos: [ATTACH]99882[/ATTACH] and the one that did so fabulously well at Christie's is a pretty good fit. As an alternative for their other one, Sotheby's suggested Muhiddin Piri Reis (there are multiple ways of transliterating & punctuating this name): [ATTACH]99884[/ATTACH] Guess everyone finds a pirate more alluring than a navigator/cartographer, so of course the latest one is being represented as Barbarossa. All three have been described as 16th century agate. I have a very different opinion as to materials used and age, so am very glad I did not pay anywhere near as much - by orders of magnitude - for my turbanned guy![/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Cameo, for Bronwen opinion!
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...