Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Bronwen, post: 10320889, member: 5833&quot;]I would consider her more of an Arethusa/nymph type than Roman woman.&nbsp; These &amp; ones I think of as Ariadne types were a subject he came back to repeatedly.</p><p><br /></p><p>My feeling is that the additional notation on the back, possibly inventory related, goes this way up &amp; is Z/M:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]518735[/ATTACH]</p><p><br /></p><p>After reading the Walters treatment description for their Samarian woman, had to wonder if [USER=5006]@kyratango[/USER] has been moonlighting there.&nbsp; Think I once used tissue paper &amp; white glue to keep a broken off bit connected to the rest of a piece.&nbsp; That&#039;s the limit of my restoration efforts.</p><p><br /></p><p>Can&#039;t believe the Walters makes no note of the signature on their piece.&nbsp; Maybe they didn&#039;t want to draw attention to what they couldn&#039;t decipher.&nbsp; It&#039;s driving me wild.&nbsp; Feel sure I&#039;ve seen it before, but...?&nbsp; Think it goes this way up:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]518736[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>But maybe this way?</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]518737[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in