Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 10433197, member: 5833"]Last night found a piece in my display cabinet that contributes to the caved/molded lava discussion. Had to wait for today to photograph, & pix are not quite all I would have hoped. Still, think they illustrate my points fairly well.</p><p><br /></p><p>The subject matter has a similarity with [USER=83302]@Snowman Cometh[/USER] 's lady. This one has a flower in her hair, so inspired by Flora, but also a quiver peeking over her left shoulder, like a Diana. Brown color & weight in hand are consistent with many lava pieces. Surface texture is that of fine grained solidified volcanic ash. Findings on the back, T hinge & C clasp, look 19th century. The mount was black when I pulled her out. Some time & elbow grease with a jewellery wipe showed her to be in a simple silver mount with twisted gold wire decoration, a common style.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]525001[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]525002[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Before posting the link, I skimmed through the article & rather cringed when I read this, but decided to post it anyway, Will have to do some editing there. A complete absence of such scraping with be supporting evidence for a verdict of a molded piece. However, since it is something easily added, by itself it is extremely weak as evidence that something is hand carved. Its presence or absence alone proves nothing. My Flora-Diana has even more scraping, scoring & gouging than the photo picks up. Nonetheless, I believe her to be molded.</p><p><br /></p><p>Even under magnification I can't really tell what's going on with the dark patch on the back, whether it is an area where the brown has been scraped away, something dropped on top, or...? I do know that despite having a lumpy look, it has a smoother, glassy feel to it when I run the edge of a fingernail across it, not the graininess of the brown. A fingertip cannot discern any change of depth between the two areas, but it looks more to me as though the brown has been scraped or simply worn away.</p><p><br /></p><p>What I see clearly that is a strong argument for a molded piece are the small blobs of excess material visible around the neckline of her gown and under her chin. Her face & neck are so smooth, a craftsman surely would not have left these places unfinished:</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]525009[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>What I am looking for in snowman's pix is any area that would have made it impossible to get the piece out of a rigid mold and that could not have been created by some hand finishing post-mold. So far, not seeing any.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 10433197, member: 5833"]Last night found a piece in my display cabinet that contributes to the caved/molded lava discussion. Had to wait for today to photograph, & pix are not quite all I would have hoped. Still, think they illustrate my points fairly well. The subject matter has a similarity with [USER=83302]@Snowman Cometh[/USER] 's lady. This one has a flower in her hair, so inspired by Flora, but also a quiver peeking over her left shoulder, like a Diana. Brown color & weight in hand are consistent with many lava pieces. Surface texture is that of fine grained solidified volcanic ash. Findings on the back, T hinge & C clasp, look 19th century. The mount was black when I pulled her out. Some time & elbow grease with a jewellery wipe showed her to be in a simple silver mount with twisted gold wire decoration, a common style. [ATTACH=full]525001[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]525002[/ATTACH] Before posting the link, I skimmed through the article & rather cringed when I read this, but decided to post it anyway, Will have to do some editing there. A complete absence of such scraping with be supporting evidence for a verdict of a molded piece. However, since it is something easily added, by itself it is extremely weak as evidence that something is hand carved. Its presence or absence alone proves nothing. My Flora-Diana has even more scraping, scoring & gouging than the photo picks up. Nonetheless, I believe her to be molded. Even under magnification I can't really tell what's going on with the dark patch on the back, whether it is an area where the brown has been scraped away, something dropped on top, or...? I do know that despite having a lumpy look, it has a smoother, glassy feel to it when I run the edge of a fingernail across it, not the graininess of the brown. A fingertip cannot discern any change of depth between the two areas, but it looks more to me as though the brown has been scraped or simply worn away. What I see clearly that is a strong argument for a molded piece are the small blobs of excess material visible around the neckline of her gown and under her chin. Her face & neck are so smooth, a craftsman surely would not have left these places unfinished: [ATTACH=full]525009[/ATTACH] What I am looking for in snowman's pix is any area that would have made it impossible to get the piece out of a rigid mold and that could not have been created by some hand finishing post-mold. So far, not seeing any.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...