Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 12401734, member: 5833"]Glad you're enjoying your visit to our little warren. People may not throw jewellery out, but they do bury it & sometimes lose it. Since North America was never occupied by Roman troops, we don't find the kind of goodies that turn up in places that once were. E.g.,</p><p><br /></p><p><a href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/detected-big-gold-roman-ring.93767/" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/detected-big-gold-roman-ring.93767/">Detected big gold Roman ring</a></p><p><br /></p><p>The field of glyptics is closely intertwined with archeology. Intact graves of the rich & powerful are the best source of info for dating, provenance & the dispersion of culture in the ancient world.</p><p><br /></p><p>As evelyb30 said, a shell cameo such as yours was not likely to survive the millennia. But cameos of any sort are much less common than intaglios, and--although we know shells were being traded & carved in prehistory-- stone & glass gems are far more common than shell. </p><p><br /></p><p>Cameos are primarily ornamental, although ones with a gorgon's head were probably apotropaic (protection against evil). On the other hand, & on the hand, an intaglio set in a ring was functional as a personal seal; the metal it was set in an indicator of status. They also had a fair chance of surviving over time. Browsing the gem impressions taken by <a href="https://www.carc.ox.ac.uk/carc/gems/James-Tassie" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.carc.ox.ac.uk/carc/gems/James-Tassie" rel="nofollow">James Tassie</a> in the late 18th century gives one an idea of their numbers. His impressions also record the activities of gem engravers of his own time.</p><p><br /></p><p>The English language literature on cameos from the 19th century on is not great. Some of it self-published, most of it in need of a knowledgeable editor. I gave my views in the thread we have on references, starting with this post:</p><p><a href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/books-on-antique-and-vintage-jewelry-to-recommend.32842/#post-434526" class="internalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://www.antiquers.com/threads/books-on-antique-and-vintage-jewelry-to-recommend.32842/#post-434526">Books on antique and vintage jewelry to recommend</a></p><p><br /></p><p>There is quite a lot on engraved gems from earlier times. Gisela Richter, John Boardman, Charles King are some of the prominent names in that field. Also the two volumes of <i>La collezione Paoletti</i>.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Bronwen, post: 12401734, member: 5833"]Glad you're enjoying your visit to our little warren. People may not throw jewellery out, but they do bury it & sometimes lose it. Since North America was never occupied by Roman troops, we don't find the kind of goodies that turn up in places that once were. E.g., [URL='https://www.antiquers.com/threads/detected-big-gold-roman-ring.93767/']Detected big gold Roman ring[/URL] The field of glyptics is closely intertwined with archeology. Intact graves of the rich & powerful are the best source of info for dating, provenance & the dispersion of culture in the ancient world. As evelyb30 said, a shell cameo such as yours was not likely to survive the millennia. But cameos of any sort are much less common than intaglios, and--although we know shells were being traded & carved in prehistory-- stone & glass gems are far more common than shell. Cameos are primarily ornamental, although ones with a gorgon's head were probably apotropaic (protection against evil). On the other hand, & on the hand, an intaglio set in a ring was functional as a personal seal; the metal it was set in an indicator of status. They also had a fair chance of surviving over time. Browsing the gem impressions taken by [URL='https://www.carc.ox.ac.uk/carc/gems/James-Tassie']James Tassie[/URL] in the late 18th century gives one an idea of their numbers. His impressions also record the activities of gem engravers of his own time. The English language literature on cameos from the 19th century on is not great. Some of it self-published, most of it in need of a knowledgeable editor. I gave my views in the thread we have on references, starting with this post: [URL='https://www.antiquers.com/threads/books-on-antique-and-vintage-jewelry-to-recommend.32842/#post-434526']Books on antique and vintage jewelry to recommend[/URL] There is quite a lot on engraved gems from earlier times. Gisela Richter, John Boardman, Charles King are some of the prominent names in that field. Also the two volumes of [I]La collezione Paoletti[/I].[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
CAMEOS: Show & Tell or Ask & Answer
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...