Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;evelyb30, post: 373176, member: 36&quot;]It&#039;s possible, but I&#039;d half dismissed the idea, since the 15000 was casualties for both sides.&nbsp; I don&#039;t think a soldier would have included the &quot;enemy&quot; in a count of injuries, and the total is wrong for the number of soldiers involved unless it was just his regiment.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in