Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Couch Potato Wannabe, post: 2710309, member: 14066&quot;]In JayBees defence, I&#039;d like to say they were likely just responding in relation to a technical ideal of what such works are judged by, as opposed to trying to be mean or unnecessarily critical of your piece.&nbsp; I tend to steer away from any such comments as I&#039;ve seen them be taken the wrong way too often.&nbsp; If press for further information or specifics about the quality or refinement of a persons item, I tend to get very wordy in my explanations of any comments relating to that as I don&#039;t wish to allow room for misinterpretation of it being a personal jab at someones piece.&nbsp; </p><p><br /></p><p>People come in here with items, they often admire and enjoy, I don&#039;t have issue with pointing out if something may not be as old or potentially valuable as they may hope, but I steer clear of telling someone what &#039;I&#039; think of their piece or how it may be viewed by those in the field.&nbsp; Not being in the field myself, I leave that to the experts.</p><p><br /></p><p>JayBee has been around in here a long time, and I&#039;ve not seen them be unjustly unkind to others.&nbsp; Please don&#039;t take their remarks as a personal put down of you or your item.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in