Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Natalia006, post: 9560357, member: 83001&quot;]Thank you for the detailed answer! I learned a lot.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>&quot;As we already said, this isn&#039;t antique.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=";)" unselectable="on" /></p><p>Natalia, why don&#039;t you visit museums, castles, etc to get acquainted with the look and aura (for lack of a better word) of true antiques.&quot;</p><p><br /></p><p>My point with that comment was not that it is antique, I know now that it is not. </p><p><br /></p><p>I just get a lot of comments on different antique-related platforms about extrinsic worth, quality and monetary value of a piece when it comes to antiques, without me inquiring about it in the first place. I never experienced it in this frequency when it comes to other collections and hobbies, I guess because there is a lot of reselling going on in the antique world.</p><p>So I wanted to clarify that as a beginner, and in general, I pick up things that I think might be antique to learn about: if it truly is an antique, origin and age. The worth is irrelevant to me and I thought that might be worth mentioning because, one comment: &quot;it is not worth much money at all, you will learn what is worth money (...)&quot;. That is not my goal at all! My question was about its age ( and if it&#039;s an antique) and the origin. Not if it&#039;s worth money, not if it is high quality.</p><p><br /></p><p>It really isn&#039;t a big deal at all, and I understand where everyone was coming from. I just wanted to clarify because I felt my point getting misunderstood.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks everyone![/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in