Featured Date of glass and gold Raj trophy brooch, Victorian. Help please.

Discussion in 'Jewelry' started by Any Jewelry, Jun 16, 2019.

  1. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    It is a Victorian(?) unmarked gold brooch, made like Raj period tiger trophy jewellery.
    The tiger claws or teeth are actually a one piece glass replica. Obviously made for those who couldn't afford the real deal, but could afford a little gold.
    The gold tests as ca 9k.
    I found a similar style one on Etsy, but that one had two separate glass pieces, set in brass, and no useful information.

    My question is, does anyone have any idea when this style tiger trophy jewellery was made? Victorian is such a long period, can anyone narrow it down?
    The hinge could be 1890s, so my guess is after 1890.
    And would this have been made in the UK or in India, Malaysia, etc?

    It is about 5 cm wide. The pin has a slight bend in the middle. The 'horns' are slightly irregular in length and curve. The dangle is teardrop shaped.

    Thank you for looking.:)

    upload_2019-6-16_13-26-35.jpeg
    upload_2019-6-16_13-25-55.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Jun 16, 2019
    Phaik Hooi, Xristina, KSW and 9 others like this.
  2. kyratango

    kyratango Bug jewellery addiction!

    Sweet piece, AJ! And no animal was harmed to make this :joyful:
    I never seen faux teeth or claws on period pieces before. Only on 70s jewellery and after.
    Maybe the original organic ornament was damaged and replaced?
    I agree with you for the construction's date, but can't place it in a geographic area:bucktooth:
     
    Xristina, KSW, Bronwen and 3 others like this.
  3. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Thanks kyra.:kiss:
    :happy: Exactly, I wouldn't have bought it otherwise.
    Could be, it is a very simple construction, so parts can be replaced easily.
     
    Bronwen, Jivvy, judy and 1 other person like this.
  4. Barn Owl

    Barn Owl Well-Known Member

    Love it! What is the stone in the center--glass or ruby?
     
    judy, Bronwen and Any Jewelry like this.
  5. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Thanks Barn.:happy:
    The centre stone is good old glass.;)
     
    judy, Bronwen and Barn Owl like this.
  6. Bronwen

    Bronwen Well-Known Member

    The 9k argues strongly for Britain. No Indian jeweller would even consider that real gold. Visually, the claws are very realistic. Suspect mold taken from real thing; otherwise, why bother with that little split on the back, which no one is going to see. Faux, but quality.

    Hinge too late for brooch to have anything to do with Victoria's being proclaimed Empress of India.
     
    Xristina, judy, Any Jewelry and 2 others like this.
  7. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    True, but in colonial times people would also take gold or silver to a jeweller to be made into whatever they wanted. Not saying that was the case here, this could have been a larger scale production line made in Birmingham.
    I have a ca 9k antique Malaysian gold item, and Malaysia was also tiger hunting territory.:(
    Absolutely, and there is nothing that indicates a commemorative piece of jewellery. Just commemorative of hunting glass tigers.:playful:
    Yes, that adds to the realism. In fact I studied the seller's photos very closely to make sure it wasn't real. It was difficult to see, the brooch was filthy with dirt stuck in all the little roundels, but then I saw the two claws were actually one piece. So I gave myself the go ahead.:)
     
    kyratango and Bronwen like this.
  8. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    upload_2019-6-16_13-5-53.jpeg

    That's a claw....

    upload_2019-6-16_13-9-42.jpeg

    that's a tooth.........

    does no one here have a cat ....:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::cat::cat::cat:
     
  9. komokwa

    komokwa The Truth is out there...!

    that's a really nice replica......the lines in it make it look real !!!! :):)
     
    Bronwen, judy, KSW and 1 other person like this.
  10. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Even had a big cat, not a tiger though.:playful: I actually thought these were meant to be teeth, but kept the claw option open:
     
    Bronwen, judy, KSW and 2 others like this.
  11. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    The gold colour looks British to me, as does that back. Cultural appropriation was our speciality in the 19th C.
     
    Bronwen, judy, KSW and 3 others like this.
  12. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Thanks.:happy: Any thoughts on the date?
    Most European countries, Orientalism etc.
     
  13. Darkwing Manor

    Darkwing Manor Well-Known Member

  14. Ownedbybear

    Ownedbybear Well-Known Member

    Late 19th makes sense to me.
     
  15. Any Jewelry

    Any Jewelry Well-Known Member

    Wonderful info, Darkwing, thanks. It is beautiful jewellery, but sad to think what was the cause of such beauty, the slaughter of beautiful creatures.
    I am very happy to know my glass tiger didn't suffer.:)
    The other jewellery on the hairpin site is gorgeous!
    Thanks, late 19th it is.:) In this case 1890s, given the hinge.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page