Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;antidiem, post: 1569877, member: 30&quot;]thanks for checking, Debora</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Blooey, I keep coming back to this thought too, but litho offset is also in my background and the way this has faded bothers me too. I was unable to make out any sort of print pattern though the photos are very small in size. The only detail shot is of the sky, which sort of looks like watercolor. </p><p><br /></p><p>[USER=12000]@Vicky McFadden[/USER] , how thick is the paper, what does the weave of the paper look like? Please photograph close up details so we can see and the back of the paper is important to see too. I bet you can get a better detail of the signature too.. </p><p><br /></p><p>I&#039;m not yet convinced this is not a print and agree with Blooey that the fading makes it look like a print. I will also admit that the other day, I saw a faded old oil painting. Reds tend to fade fastest, your painting is no exception, Vicky. </p><p><br /></p><p>I would also ask to see a close up of the damage, is there a scratch on it?[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in