Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;DragonflyWink, post: 1654984, member: 111&quot;]Oh, no - I didn&#039;t take it that way at all!&nbsp; I&#039;ve had little luck in getting worse errors than that corrected, and there is a lot of valuable information on 925-1000, but the site is a bit outdated (again, there are reasons).&nbsp; I&#039;ve sent corrections, with proof, to a couple of other sites too, without hearing back from them or seeing corrections made (there is one site, riddled with major errors, that has made many corrections over the years, but still has some wrong info).&nbsp; Was really just pointing out that there are very few, if any, perfect references, whether printed or online, and checking more than one reference is usually a good idea...</p><p><br /></p><p>~Cheryl[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in