Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Is "brushed" gold indicative of newer jewelry?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 3462907, member: 2844"]Welcome Lucas.</p><p>I can only see the photo of the back, but in this case that is the most important one. It is not brushed, but textured as you said in the post.</p><p>This kind of texture is indicative of costume jewellery. So the auctioneer is right to call it gold-toned, and not gold.</p><p>The stone seems to be a real stone, but not precious.</p><p><br /></p><p><img src="https://www.antiquers.com/attachments/screenshot_20210119-105611-jpg.303388/" class="bbCodeImage wysiwygImage" alt="" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 3462907, member: 2844"]Welcome Lucas. I can only see the photo of the back, but in this case that is the most important one. It is not brushed, but textured as you said in the post. This kind of texture is indicative of costume jewellery. So the auctioneer is right to call it gold-toned, and not gold. The stone seems to be a real stone, but not precious. [IMG]https://www.antiquers.com/attachments/screenshot_20210119-105611-jpg.303388/[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Is "brushed" gold indicative of newer jewelry?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...