Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;James Conrad, post: 509690, member: 5066&quot;]No, to me they are different, &quot;my&quot; chair the pommels are &quot;flat sided&quot; and have 3 incised rings/lines, where on MET chair they are more &quot;rounded shape which strikes a dissonant note&quot; and no incised rings either. Naturally, I can blow up the pics to whatever size i want which makes things easier to see but i can&#039;t post cuz forum doesn&#039;t allow! <img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/frown.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":(" unselectable="on" /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p>Well, restorer was working back in the day &amp; was doing what he thought was best and or the directions he was given and, MISTAKES WERE MADE! trust me. If you look at chair # 4 (not shown in pics) they are like &quot;my&quot; chair, flat sided with incised lines.</p><p>Also, Safford had the luxury of studying the Bolles collection for her entire career after all, she is a furniture scholar and was examining the &quot;whole&quot; of the collection. Safford is saying in a very polite, academic way&nbsp; &quot;we screwed up the restoration on the pommels on chair # 5&quot;. <img src="styles/default/xenforo/clear.png" class="mceSmilieSprite mceSmilie51" alt=":hilarious:" unselectable="on" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in