Message:

<p>[QUOTE=&quot;Hallingdalen, post: 11591696, member: 93477&quot;]I can see why Scandinavian Empire is a very reasonable reading, especially given the restraint, material choices, and overall neoclassical discipline. Where I’ve hesitated to read it as strictly Empire is the softer bow-front curvature, the reliance on inlay rather than applied bronze, and the overall lightness of the piece, which to me feels a bit removed from fully developed Empire — even in a Scandinavian context.</p><p><br /></p><p>At the same time, I don’t think it’s classically Gustavian either, as the volume and curvature feel later than that. For me it sits most comfortably as Scandinavian late neoclassical, transitional between Gustavian and early Empire, rather than cleanly in one category. Very interested to hear what specific cues make it read as firmly Empire to you.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in