Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
Poorly cared for lithograph - but early work
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="smallaxe, post: 1970233, member: 13430"]In going through family heirlooms and collected junk from my wife's aunt, there was a lithograph in the bottom of the box. It appears to have never been framed, nor well cared for. There is a pressure tear near the center although it is hard to see, and there is a pressure mark from some object probably packed above it at some time. Although someone in the family may have been acquainted with the artist, I don't know of any connection, and the artist is not a member of the family. My first thought was that I should chuck it, since there's no known family history attached to give it family value, and the foxing and tear surely destroy any value a print might have. </p><p><br /></p><p>However, I looked up the artist, Fred Freeman (Frederick William Freeman 1906-1988), and he had some notice as an illustrator, particularly of military and space themes after the 1940's. In trying to find examples of his work, I didn't find any as early as the print we have. It is signed and dated in pencil 1935, fairly early in his career. From a <a href="https://americansocietyofmarineartists.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/ASMA-Summer09-N_J.pdf" target="_blank" class="externalLink ProxyLink" data-proxy-href="https://americansocietyofmarineartists.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/ASMA-Summer09-N_J.pdf" rel="nofollow">biography in the American Society of Marine Artists</a>:</p><blockquote><p><br /></p><p>Freeman took advantage of these slow years to advance his technical skills as a lithographer. In 1933 he studied with the master of lithograph printers George C. Miller (1894 – 1965), who did work for many well-known artists such as Bellows and Benton.</p></blockquote><p><br /></p><p>From this it seems it is an early lithograph of his. Now I'm less inclined to chuck it, at least without doing some checking first. There is a 1977 "artist proof" lithograph of his on ebay for $145. Original paintings/drawings of his fetch $800-900. Despite being early work, does the damage render it worthless? I'm in a quandary what to do with it.</p><p><br /></p><p>It's too big for my scanner, but this gives a idea of what it is (the white square in the rightmost sail is not damage, it's original to the print). Paper size is 10.75" x 15.25". Other than the artist name and date, there is nothing else written on it.</p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]246984[/ATTACH] </p><p><br /></p><p>[ATTACH=full]246985[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="smallaxe, post: 1970233, member: 13430"]In going through family heirlooms and collected junk from my wife's aunt, there was a lithograph in the bottom of the box. It appears to have never been framed, nor well cared for. There is a pressure tear near the center although it is hard to see, and there is a pressure mark from some object probably packed above it at some time. Although someone in the family may have been acquainted with the artist, I don't know of any connection, and the artist is not a member of the family. My first thought was that I should chuck it, since there's no known family history attached to give it family value, and the foxing and tear surely destroy any value a print might have. However, I looked up the artist, Fred Freeman (Frederick William Freeman 1906-1988), and he had some notice as an illustrator, particularly of military and space themes after the 1940's. In trying to find examples of his work, I didn't find any as early as the print we have. It is signed and dated in pencil 1935, fairly early in his career. From a [URL='https://americansocietyofmarineartists.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/ASMA-Summer09-N_J.pdf']biography in the American Society of Marine Artists[/URL]: [INDENT] Freeman took advantage of these slow years to advance his technical skills as a lithographer. In 1933 he studied with the master of lithograph printers George C. Miller (1894 – 1965), who did work for many well-known artists such as Bellows and Benton.[/INDENT] From this it seems it is an early lithograph of his. Now I'm less inclined to chuck it, at least without doing some checking first. There is a 1977 "artist proof" lithograph of his on ebay for $145. Original paintings/drawings of his fetch $800-900. Despite being early work, does the damage render it worthless? I'm in a quandary what to do with it. It's too big for my scanner, but this gives a idea of what it is (the white square in the rightmost sail is not damage, it's original to the print). Paper size is 10.75" x 15.25". Other than the artist name and date, there is nothing else written on it. [ATTACH=full]246984[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]246985[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Art
>
Poorly cared for lithograph - but early work
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...