Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
real Guangxu period?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 306373, member: 2844"]They are very nice, Phaik. And still in one piece (well, three pieces). Probably made in Canton for the Peranakan taste, there is no missing them in a crowd.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=":)" unselectable="on" /></p><p>I don't know the marks, but the glaze has age, and I see no reason why they wouldn't be Guangxu.</p><p>Kangxi would have been great, priceless even, but this style was never made during the Kangxi period, so you're wise enough.<img src="styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png" class="mceSmilie" alt=";)" unselectable="on" />[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="Any Jewelry, post: 306373, member: 2844"]They are very nice, Phaik. And still in one piece (well, three pieces). Probably made in Canton for the Peranakan taste, there is no missing them in a crowd.:) I don't know the marks, but the glaze has age, and I see no reason why they wouldn't be Guangxu. Kangxi would have been great, priceless even, but this style was never made during the Kangxi period, so you're wise enough.;)[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Pottery, Glass, and Porcelain
>
real Guangxu period?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...