Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Refractometer
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="drg642, post: 4255673, member: 74"]So, I have been watching a few you-tube videos, and I had a long chat with a knowledgeable person at Kassoy. I will share what I have learned.</p><p><br /></p><p>The reading of the shadow lines on a traditional refractometer seems like it could be difficult, especially with mounted gems. I asked the guy at Kassoy the difference between the $100, $500, and $1200 refractometers, and he said mainly it was the clarity and ease of reading these shadow lines. I am not very nimble with this sort of thing, and I do question my ability to use this instrument in a way where I would feel confident with the results.</p><p><br /></p><p>The Kassoy guy suggested I consider the Gem-n-Eye Digital Refractometer. You put the stone on the sensor, and the machine gives you an RI reading and 1 or more possible stone IDs. After looking into it, the machine is not really reading the refractive index, but rather reflectivity, which gives readings very close to the refractive index. As Ce BCA noted, the problem is, several stones will have similar reflectivity readings. With a traditional refractometer, as I understand it, the difference between the high and low readings on a doubly refractive stone will enable a positive ID, but the digital refractometer doesn't measure this. </p><p>I think in combination with my Presidium and what I can see about the stone color that I could sometimes get an accurate ID. For example, the Gem-n-Eye could give a reading of 1.698 and say that the stone is peridot or tanzanite. The presidium reading and the color of the stone would make this pretty easy to distinguish between peridot and tanzanite. Others would not be so clear cut.</p><p><br /></p><p>Anyway, sorry to be so lengthy. My conclusion is that I don't know if I will buy either a traditional or digital refractometer. Still pondering if I could learn how to use a traditional refractometer with any confidence, or if the digital instrument would produce enough information to make many positive IDs. Both seem difficult to use with mounted gems, thought the digital one I think would be better in this area. The Kassoy guy did say that while they don't like to take returns, they would allow a return if I tried the Gen-n-Eye and didn't find it useful.[/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="drg642, post: 4255673, member: 74"]So, I have been watching a few you-tube videos, and I had a long chat with a knowledgeable person at Kassoy. I will share what I have learned. The reading of the shadow lines on a traditional refractometer seems like it could be difficult, especially with mounted gems. I asked the guy at Kassoy the difference between the $100, $500, and $1200 refractometers, and he said mainly it was the clarity and ease of reading these shadow lines. I am not very nimble with this sort of thing, and I do question my ability to use this instrument in a way where I would feel confident with the results. The Kassoy guy suggested I consider the Gem-n-Eye Digital Refractometer. You put the stone on the sensor, and the machine gives you an RI reading and 1 or more possible stone IDs. After looking into it, the machine is not really reading the refractive index, but rather reflectivity, which gives readings very close to the refractive index. As Ce BCA noted, the problem is, several stones will have similar reflectivity readings. With a traditional refractometer, as I understand it, the difference between the high and low readings on a doubly refractive stone will enable a positive ID, but the digital refractometer doesn't measure this. I think in combination with my Presidium and what I can see about the stone color that I could sometimes get an accurate ID. For example, the Gem-n-Eye could give a reading of 1.698 and say that the stone is peridot or tanzanite. The presidium reading and the color of the stone would make this pretty easy to distinguish between peridot and tanzanite. Others would not be so clear cut. Anyway, sorry to be so lengthy. My conclusion is that I don't know if I will buy either a traditional or digital refractometer. Still pondering if I could learn how to use a traditional refractometer with any confidence, or if the digital instrument would produce enough information to make many positive IDs. Both seem difficult to use with mounted gems, thought the digital one I think would be better in this area. The Kassoy guy did say that while they don't like to take returns, they would allow a return if I tried the Gen-n-Eye and didn't find it useful.[/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Jewelry
>
Refractometer
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...