Log in or Sign up
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Books
>
Royal Academy Pictures - 1896. Reprint?
>
Reply to Thread
Message:
<p>[QUOTE="HailCthulhu, post: 473221, member: 9661"]I recently came across a copy of the <i>Royal Academy Pictures - 1896</i> and was immediately stricken by the glossiness of the pages. I then assumed it had to be a reprint and looked for a publisher date, but there was absolutely no information or even anything to do with copyright beyond a statement on one of the introductory pages which read: "[Permission to Reproduce the Pictures and Sculptures herein contained has been accorded by Artists and Owners, and Copyright is in every case strictly reserved]" Upon further research I found the cover to be distinctly different, and from the limited resources I could find the others included a gallery map, while mine instead included an introduction I couldn't find in the others. I researched the publisher and found it to be the <i>Cassell and Company, Limited, London, Paris & Melbourne</i>, while the last page read: "Printed by Cassell & Company, Limited, La Belle Sauvage, London, E.C" spine is bound by thread and not staples, and there's noticeable aging on some of the first pages. I'll admit to being absolutely confounded by this. What do you think?</p><p>[ATTACH=full]160394[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160395[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160396[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160397[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160398[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160399[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160400[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]</p><p><br /></p>
[QUOTE="HailCthulhu, post: 473221, member: 9661"]I recently came across a copy of the [I]Royal Academy Pictures - 1896[/I] and was immediately stricken by the glossiness of the pages. I then assumed it had to be a reprint and looked for a publisher date, but there was absolutely no information or even anything to do with copyright beyond a statement on one of the introductory pages which read: "[Permission to Reproduce the Pictures and Sculptures herein contained has been accorded by Artists and Owners, and Copyright is in every case strictly reserved]" Upon further research I found the cover to be distinctly different, and from the limited resources I could find the others included a gallery map, while mine instead included an introduction I couldn't find in the others. I researched the publisher and found it to be the [I]Cassell and Company, Limited, London, Paris & Melbourne[/I], while the last page read: "Printed by Cassell & Company, Limited, La Belle Sauvage, London, E.C" spine is bound by thread and not staples, and there's noticeable aging on some of the first pages. I'll admit to being absolutely confounded by this. What do you think? [ATTACH=full]160394[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160395[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160396[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160397[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160398[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160399[/ATTACH] [ATTACH=full]160400[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Your name or email address:
Do you already have an account?
No, create an account now.
Yes, my password is:
Forgot your password?
Stay logged in
Antiques Board
Home
Forums
>
Antique Forums
>
Books
>
Royal Academy Pictures - 1896. Reprint?
>
Home
Home
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Activity
Recent Posts
Forums
Forums
Quick Links
Search Forums
Recent Posts
Gallery
Gallery
Quick Links
Search Media
New Media
Members
Members
Quick Links
Notable Members
Registered Members
Current Visitors
Recent Activity
New Profile Posts
Menu
Search
Search titles only
Posted by Member:
Separate names with a comma.
Newer Than:
Search this thread only
Search this forum only
Display results as threads
Useful Searches
Recent Posts
More...